NELGC North East London Gymnastics Club

Help us fundraise for light refurbishment of the new venue - £2262.41 raised by the gymnasts so far:

All donations to go our non-profit club.

Help us fundraise for refurbishment of the new venue - £2480 raised by the gymnasts so far:

All donations to go our non-profit club.

  Home
  Class timetable
  Booking/Membership fee information
  Types of classes offered
  Competition Results
  Newsletter
  Calendar dates
  Schools
  Coaches
  About NELGC
  How to find us
  Photo Gallery
**VENUE CAMPAIGN
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  We are Gymmark accredited

      

VENUE CAMPAIGN    
 

Email from NELGC to Mayor Jules Pipe, in response to his letter below.



8th September 2009

Dear Jules Pipes

I would like to take this opportunity to respond to your email which was forwarded to me by several Hackney residents today.

At no point during the tender process was I, or anyone from NELGC provided with a copy of the Head of Terms.  The only documentation prior to tendering for the lease was an application form that I completed and returned with our business proposal, which was provided well in advance of the deadline date.  The day before the interview I was informed by Geraldine Glandon that I must have two guarantors, who were not associated with the club or individuals who would sign the lease. I was given 2 hours to provide this information the day before the selection interview.  I was informed that if I did not do this NELGC would be withdrawn and I was refused any documentation to give to the guarantors. I was verbally informed that the guarantors would be liable for 3 – 6 months rent.  At this point I was also told about the six months deposit, after I had already submitted the business plan.  Although requested, no written documentation of anything was provided at any point prior to the selection interview. If you have been informed to the contrary I would like to see the documentation.

2 weeks after the selection interview I was given a rough draft of the Heads of Terms.  I responded by email to the Heads of Terms and had a number of points agreed by email.  I was also informed further information was to follow, this did not arrive.

As communication with Hackney Council was proving difficult and I had not received clarification of some areas of the Heads of Terms I requested a meeting with David Hawkes on the 20th August. At this meeting I received a letter from Philip Glascoe, I assume this is the same letter you had as it matches your response.  I responded on the 21st highlighting the points which were incorrect in the letter.   I have not received a response to this communication.

On the 28th August I provided Hackney Council with a copy of the minutes (which are also on our website) and a copy of the constitution.

On the 21st August I received a copy of the final Heads of Terms.
 
I am still waiting for some information on estate charges and surveyors fees.

On the 26th August the NELGC committee met to discuss the Heads of Terms.

To respond to other points you have made:

Business rates:
The council were advised that we intended to seek Charitable status and as such would get 80% reduction in business rates with 20% discretionary relief also possible, this is reflected in our cash flow and does not need to be altered.


Surveyors and solicitors fees:
Our surveyor and solicitor fees have been accounted for in our cash flow.  The fees of £2800 to pay for Hackney Councils fees were not.  I’m advised that it is normal for each party to bear there own costs. Hackney have now agreed to reduce these to £1,600.  Perhaps you could tell me why we have to pay these when Hackney has an in house team which as hackney residents we are already paying for!


Foregoing 3 months rent advance:
I was informed that the council had changed its policy and was taking rent monthly rather than 3 monthly.  However they would still want the initial 3 months rent in advance.  They did agree to reduce the 6 month deposit down to a more normal 3 months.  So my understanding is that they are still requesting 6 months monies in advance. Perhaps this needs to be clarified.
 
NELGC has been working extremely hard to ensure that this process moves as quickly and as smoothly as possible. However, we have been advised that a request for:
3 months deposit
3 months rent
3 guarantors with unlimited liability is unreasonable and advised not to sign anything until this is resolved.

NELGC agreed that our solicitor would act on our behalf directly with Hackney Council regarding the Heads of Terms.  

Given this I take exception to your response and would request that you ensure your information is accurate before it is sent.

Kind Regards Lara
NELGC


 

Letter from Mayor Jules Pipe, 8th September 2009:


Re: North East London Gymnastics Club

Thank you for your email regarding the above matter, which was received in my office on 18th August 2009. I am sorry to hear of the difficulties being experienced by NELGC.

The Council’s Property Services department have advised me that they are working hard with NELGC to ensure that they can occupy their new premises as quickly as possible. The suggestion that the Council is holding proceedings up is, I am assured, incorrect.

Regarding the preparation of a lease, the Council cannot instruct its legal team to prepare the lease until NELGC has agreed to the Heads of Terms. The property at 46 Milton Grove was marketed on a commercial basis, and the majority of the Heads of Terms were made available to applicants in advance. Despite this, I have been advised that since NELGC was selected as the preferred bidder, it has repeatedly sought to amend the Heads of Terms, and to date has still not indicated its agreement. It is this lack of agreement on the part of NELGC, rather than any inaction on the part of the Council, which is the cause of the current delay.

The Council has, in fact, agreed to a number of NELGC’s requests, including taking the unusual step of agreeing to forgo one quarter’s advance rent, which had been a clear condition of the original offer. In addition, the Council has forwarded a provisional draft of the lease agreement to NELGC despite the fact that the Heads of Terms have still not been signed. Neither of these actions would normally be offered to prospective commercial tenants, and I believe that this demonstrates the efforts the Council is taking to assist NELGC to move to these premises.

In addition, I understand that the Council had already brought to NELGC’s attention the fact that the terms of their own constitution prohibited them from trading. I have been advised that an extraordinary general meeting has now occurred to amend the constitution, but that the Council has still not received the copies of the minutes of this meeting and of the new constitution from NELGC. The organisation must provide these documents in order for a lease to be drawn up.

I understand that there are also a number of other points on which the action of NELGC is required, including accounting for Business Rates payments in their cash flow projections. In addition, statutory legal and surveyance fees will be payable before a final lease can be drawn up.

With respect to the need for guarantors for the rent, this has arisen as a result of NELGC’s decision to change the name on the lease from the owner of the business to the business itself. I understand that this was in order to qualify for a Business Rates reduction, in line with the appropriate legislation. The Council has a responsibility to protect its interests and the public funds for which it is responsible, which means that it has to ask for guarantors in a situation such as this.

With regard to 46 Milton Grove being occupied by squatters, it is not the case that the Council has done nothing about this matter. The Council has followed the necessary legal process to evict the squatters, and now has a court date of 10th September 2009 for the eviction hearing. There are a number of steps which the Council needed to take before applying for a court order, and it would have jeopardised its success had it not followed the due legal process. The court will, of course, make the ultimate decision on this matter, but the Council will be seeking immediate eviction and possession of the premises on this date.

Nevertheless, the presence of the squatters is not currently the barrier to NELGC occupying 46 Milton Grove. Even if the squatters were to be evicted immediately, the situation cannot be moved forward until NELGC takes the actions outlined above.

Whilst the Council will continue to offer its support to NELGC, I have been advised that if NELGC is unwilling or unable to reach an agreement, the Council does have the option of going back to other organisations that made bids for the lease, or reopening the tendering process. However, I do hope that this course of action will not be necessary, and that NELGC will now take the necessary action to move this process forward.

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact David Hawkes, Senior Estates Surveyor, on 020 8356 2803.

Yours sincerely

Jules Pipe
Mayor of Hackney